So, there was a deal resolving the U.S. debt ceiling battle in Washington, D.C. Now what? First, let's look at where we are.
The words "crypto" and "cryptocurrencies" don't appear at all in the initial version of the deal. I wrestle with whether that's good or bad. The Digital Asset Mining Energy (DAME) excise tax wasn't included, so I've landed on the former since the omission is positive for the industry.
The proposal would've levied a 30% tax on any firm using computing resources to mine digital assets. The premise was driven by concerns about the consumption of fossil fuels in mining, and subsequent environmental harm.
Ironically, the debt ceiling agreement may be viewed as a win for fossil-fuel advocates. It includes a provision for the expedited completion of a natural-gas pipeline between West Virginia and Virginia (the Mountain Valley Pipeline). That is expected to transmit natural gas from the Marcellus and Utica shale gas fields to markets in the Mid- and South Atlantic regions of the U.S.
At first glance, this provision may actually be a positive for bitcoin (BTC) miners. Since some of them use excess natural gas as an energy source, several have previously set up operations near the Marcellus and Utica Shales to accomplish this.
Increased infrastructure for natural gas may lead to increased production, and thus increased excess gas, resulting in increased sources of energy for miners in the region. I would label this as an indirect benefit, and definitely one that was unintentional.
Indirect benefits notwithstanding, bitcoin reacted favorably to the agreement, with prices increasing 4% on Sunday. The move higher seems related more to increased certainty, and at least a sigh of relief that nothing antagonistic towards crypto was included.
EmoticonEmoticon