Flipping through the channels this past weekend, (and being an avid sports fan), I landed briefly on this year's Major League Baseball draft. Believe it or not, as the event progressed, thoughts of digital assets crossed my mind.
Admittedly, baseball and crypto don't have the most tangible (or even tangential) of connections, but that's how my mind works sometimes.
At any rate, anyone familiar with drafts knows that teams select players based on what they believe they will accomplish later. This happens in essentially every sport that graces the television screen.
Baseball differs from some of its professional league counterparts because players drafted today may not see a major league field for 3-4 years – if not longer. Between draft day and debut day, years are spent in lower leagues, for development.
While bitcoin (BTC), ether (ETH) and other established digital assets are like veteran stars, altcoins are like recently drafted players. They are, for all intents and purposes, prospects, with a long road ahead before they find success – if they ever do.
But how does one evaluate a prospect in cryptocurrencies? What's even worth looking at, and where does one start?
For better or worse, my starting point for this is developer activity. I view that as a sign of protocol growth and a signal of where developers have chosen to allocate their intellectual capital. The general thesis being that where development occurs, value accrual and price appreciation may follow.
My source data comes via venture capital firm Electric Capital's developer report, which aims to "quantify the developer activity" happening across crypto and Web3 ecosystems.
Here's what I found:
New developers are leaving crypto
Before you can evaluate a prospect, it helps to see if anyone is even interested in the game. A quick look at Google search trends shows that searches for both "bitcoin" and "cryptocurrencies" are half as prevalent as they were a year ago. Also, there's been a 22% decline in active developers across the entire space since over the past year and an 8% contraction since January, according to Electric Capital's report. "New developers" decreased 18% since January, worse than the overall number, implying newcomers drove the retreat.
A wider lens is less dire, though, showing 26% and 92% increases over the past two and three years, respectively. While the overall trend has been higher, the challenges facing crypto over the most recent 12 months had an understandably negative impact on newer developers, while those operating in the space for more than 12 months have stayed the course.
Additionally, while my initial thought was that development growth leads to price acceleration, I think the jury may actually be out on that since BTC has zoomed higher amid this year's contraction.
I suspect that it may be bifurcated, where increases in price lead to increases in developer activity for bitcoin and ether, with the opposite being the case for smaller, lesser-known protocols.
Still, some crypto protocols have shown massive growth
Of the 20 ecosystems with the largest number of total developers, three have shown positive growth year-over-year, with two having tradeable tokens:
Osmosis (OSMO)
- one-year developer growth: 56%
- two-year developer growth: 296%
Osmosis, an interchain decentralized exchange (DEX) built using the Cosmo software development kit, led the way with its 56% growth in total developers over the past year. Monthly activity was strong as well, with a 26% increase between May and June.
EmoticonEmoticon