  Exploring the transformation of value in the digital age By Michael J. Casey, Chief Content Officer Oct. 1, 2021 If you were forwarded this newsletter and would like to receive it, sign up here. Sponsored by 
The confusion and fraught public conversation around crypto and its place in the world is often blamed on the fact that cryptography is extremely complicated and hard for the average person to understand. But there's an even bigger problem, one that deals with old technologies, not new ones.
It's that we human beings don't have a common language for understanding and talking about money. This week's column seeks to address that. It offers a framework for examining how our financial system has evolved over centuries and, by extension, how crypto is poised to disrupt it.
This week's podcast marks the one-year anniversary of "Money Reimagined." To celebrate it, we invited Jill Carlson of the Open Money Initiative and Raoul Pal of Real Vision back onto the show for a redux of the rich discussion they had on our show back in December. It was an opportunity to look back at all the incredible developments we've seen in this field over the past year from two quite different perspectives.
Have a listen after reading the newsletter. 
A message from CME  Step into the cryptocurrency markets with CME Micro Bitcoin futures
Trade Bitcoin futures in a smaller size Enjoy the same benefits as the larger five-bitcoin contract, settled to the regulated CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate.
Precisely scale bitcoin exposure Add more control over the amount of bitcoin exposure in your trading strategies.
Gain price discovery and transparency
Understand TradFi First  Rachel Sun/CoinDesk This week, when the team at MIT Technology Review put me into a fireside chat with journalist Charlotte Jee during their Emtech MIT conference, the assigned title for the session – "Demystifying Decentralized Finance" – got me thinking.
It occurred to me that before we demystify DeFi, or for that matter the wider ecosystem of blockchains and digital assets, we need to first demystify traditional finance (TradFi).
Most people don't have a solid understanding of how our capitalist system of payments, credit and asset transfers works. Getting to that understanding, I believe, requires looking into the deep historical roots of money and the social system of trust that has evolved around it. Only then can we develop a framework for talking about the traditional financial system and how the crypto industry seeks to disrupt it.
That's what I'll attempt to do with this column. First, I'll categorize what I see as the architectural components of the traditional, centralized, fiat- and banking-based financial system, explaining how each came into being and the purpose it serves. Then I'll map those components to their equivalents in the new, decentralized, crypto- and smart contract-based system.
A caveat: This is just one way of looking at this issue. It inevitably will have inconsistencies and contradictions. Feel free to email me with feedback, especially if some of my analogies and explanations are off.
The Money Stack
 Let's look at each part of the stack, its historical antecedents and its role in the financial system.
The Ledger
Historically, the accounting profession has been the butt of jokes, a byword for "boring." But the humble ledger-keeper is actually the foundation of human society.
It is no coincidence that the very first known examples of writing are the cuneiform records displayed on clay ledger tablets from ancient Mesopotamia, the cradle of civilization. One of those tablets includes what is thought to be the very first name ever recorded: that of a Sumerian accountant by the name of Kushim.
To create a functioning system of exchange, one in which people across a larger community than just a small village could enter into contracts for trading goods and services, societies needed a trustworthy system of record-keeping to keep track of the delivery and settlement of those agreements. That's what those ancient tablets enabled.
The technology for recording and storing those transactions has, of course, evolved tremendously from clay tablets to giant data farms. But in TradFi, the core governing principle for creating and keeping that trustworthy record hasn't changed: it's centralized, maintained by a trusted third party. Once it was Sumerian accountants like Kushim. Now it's institutions such as banks, internet platforms and applications, or government agencies.
–Michael J. Casey
Off the Charts Stable By Default  In the International Monetary Fund's just released Global Financial Stability Report, there's a chapter dedicated to risks that cryptocurrency markets may pose to the broader global economy, including recommendations for national policymakers on how to mitigate them. Among the areas of focus are stablecoins, with a discussion about the risk of "runs" on tokens perceived to be insufficiently backed to warrant their intended valuation.
Clearly, in its past, USDT was pretty volatile. Sometimes demand for a token that had become integral to many crypto exchanges' operations was so high that people were willing to pay more than $1.30 for something that was supposed to be worth $1.00. Other times, buffeted by the New York attorney general's $18.5 billion fine against Tether and partner company Bitfinex and by a hack of the latter, the price "broke the buck," dropping as low as $0.92. At such times, the price likely did capture a degree of mistrust in the integrity of the underlying assets at Tether.
A message from BlockBank  Looking for a crypto wallet with DeFi and CeFi coupled with banking and debit cards? Look no further, V2 of BlockBank's super application launches this fall, offering access to:
BlockBank has already obtained licenses for Estonian virtual currency service provider, and Australian digital currency exchange and payment service provider.
The Conversation DeFi Battles  Illustration: Rachel Sun/CoinDesk Remember the block size war? Bitcoin purists in favor of small blocks framed it as a fight – which they ultimately won – between their interest in keeping the Bitcoin network decentralized and venture capital-backed Bitcoin businesses, which wanted to increase on-chain processing capacity to make more money. Well, if a recent Twitter battle is any indication, a similar sort of division may now have just opened up in the DeFi world.
(H/T to CoinDesk's Andrew Thurman for pointing me toward this one.)
 Twitter account @InvestRepeat neatly summed up how many of the "keep DeFi decentralized" crowd felt about this.  The fight got more intense after a core developer at competing protocol Yearn weighed in with a quote-tweet:  But then Jake Chervinksy, a lawyer for the team that developed competing lending protocol Compound, chipped in with support for the Fireblocks proposal, citing Aave founder Stani Kulechov. 
Relevant Reads NFTs IRL  Two stories this week showed that the traditional art world continues to be fascinated by the possibilities posed by NFTs, even if the bidding mania that led Beeple to sell a piece for $69 million earlier this year has subsided and even though the crypto world's attention has gone to avatar-collecting communities such as the Bored Ape Yacht Club.
Money Reimagined A newsletter from CoinDesk Copyright © 2021 CoinDesk, All rights reserved. 250 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10003, USA Manage your newsletter subscriptions | Unsubscribe from all CoinDesk email |
Langganan:
Posting Komentar (Atom)
EmoticonEmoticon